Home

Episode: 4.19

Title: Family Feud

Written by: David Assael

Directed by: Adam Arkin

Aired: March 8, 1993

Log line: When a totem pole is carved for the Whirlwind family, a family feud originating from an incident in 1934 is resurrected, dividing the Native Americans in Cicely.

Listen to the podcast discussion of the episode here.

4-19-leonard_01

“Family Feud” (4.19) features the return of Leonard Quinhagak (played by Graham Greene). He is revealed to be an accomplished totem pole carver, besides being a shaman (as he was shown to be in “Wake Up Call” [3.19]). He also solves two of the episode’s three thorny problems. The first problem he tackles is Shelly’s visions of dancers, which have been plaguing her since the opening scene.

4-19-dancers-ballerinas 4-19-shelly-ballerinas2

She goes to Joel, who examines her and finds nothing wrong with her physically. So, he suggests she should get psychiatric help.

4-19-joel-01 4-19-joel-hat

Chris, her head shrinker of choice, deduces that this could be a revelatory experience — or it could be “some bad acid”, as experienced by his friend Roach. Neither suggestion seems to help Shelly much.

4-19-chris-bad-acid

In “Wake Up Call”, Leonard diagnosed Shelly’s skin condition as her shedding her skin “to be reborn, to be new.” In that episode, his prognosis seemed to be right. In “Family Feud”, he is able to tell that she is hallucinating dancers by noting her “eyes glazed over, pupils dilate[d], slight involuntary rhythmic swaying.” He suggests that she needs “a partner, a husband.”

4-19-dancers-flamenco 4-19-dancers-hiphop

In the end, her cure is a marriage, a pairing. It’s one of a few pairings that we’ll see in this episode.

4-19-shelly-04

4-19-dancers-russian 4-19-shelly-holling01

Another problem that Leonard is able to fix is the totem pole with the controversial fish crest, which leads to strife between the Raven and Bear clans.

4-19-dave-01

One possible suggestion for how to resolve this situation comes from Chris, who raises the idea of removing the fish crest entirely.This initial solution isn’t reasonable, just as Joel’s exam of Shelly didn’t get to the root of her problem.

4-19-leonard-chris-01

4-19-chris02

4-19-leonard_02

In the end it is Leonard who resolves the issue by creating a second, fish-crest-less totem pole that will stand beside the first one. These paired, parallel narratives will represent both sides of the story — twin slideshows, if we take Ed’s description a totem pole unveiling.

4-19-ed-03

4-19-totem-02 4-19-totem-034-19-ed-044-19-marilyn-01

The third problem in search of a solution is Joel and Maggie’s relationship and whether they are ‘just just’ (in Maggie’s description) or ‘just whatever’ (Joel’s term).

4-19-joel-maggie01

The first attempt to resolve these competing versions of their relationship results in Maggie proposing they be friends. Joel rejects this concept, stating that their relationship isn’t something she can “domesticate by putting in a box and mislabeling it ‘my little friend’.” As with the hallucinations and the fish crest, the first proposed solution doesn’t work.

4-19-joel-maggie02 4-19-joel-maggie03

Interestingly, a (sort of) solution stems from labelling their relationship. They try a few variations on describing their relationship until they eventually agree to identify themselves as “mutually desirous incompatibles.” That they can categorize themselves in this way brings them together in an unusual pairing, almost like the two incompatible stories depicted on the totem poles — one with the fish crest and one without — mutually incompatible stories.

4-19-joel-maggie04

4-19-joel-maggie-mutually-di

It’s worth noting that all three of these storylines also involve something unstated being represented in a concrete form that makes the idea more tangible. Shelly and Holling have been a couple for quite some time and have nearly gotten married a couple of times before. Their marriage finally solidifies their relationship in an official (albeit very brief) ceremony. Similarly, Joel and Maggie have felt attracted and repelled by one another since he arrived in town; giving their relationship the term “mutually desirous incompatibles” makes the tension between them more understandable to both of them. Finally, we see the two competing narratives of whether Harold’s actions should be celebrated or not made concrete (well, cedar, actually) in the form of two totem poles, a physical representation of what people have felt for decades. In fact, all three narratives show feelings being turned into a more stable form, whether it’s a phrase (as with Joel and Maggie), a physical object (as with the totem poles), or a ceremony (as with the wedding).

4-19-joel-maggie-enamored

4-19-leonard-ed-01

4-19-holling-maurice

Songs from the episode’s original airing:

  • Ricky Lynn Gregg, Three Nickels and a Dime
    [replaced in DVD version]
    At The Brick, Joel sees Mike and Maggie.
  • Frederic Chopin, Prelude Opus 28, No. 15
    Maggie and Mike pot plants.
  • Mark Chesnutt, Old Country
    [replaced in DVD version]
    At The Brick, Shelly asks Holling to marry her.

4-19-dave-potatoes

Themes / Recurrences: Family; the past; artistic process.

The Good: We loved the fact that the main plot centers around the show’s First Nations / Native actors and characters. It’s pretty rare and it is great to see more of Dave the Cook. Plus, Joel’s tap dancing was amazing!

The Bad: For one of us, the marriage between Shelly and Holling seemed rushed and out of the blue, especially after the last two non-events. What about all of Holling’s reservations?

The Notable: This episode marks the directorial debut of Adam Arkin (a.k.a. the actor playing the recurring character of Adam the truculent chef).

4-19-directed-by-arkin

On’s rating: 8 out of 10.

Shane’s rating: 8 out of 10.

4-19-chris-maurice

Advertisement

6 thoughts on “4.19 Family Feud

    • Yes, we’ll be writing entries for the rest of the episodes, as well as discussing them on our podcast. We cover a new episode each week, though we’ll be taking a two week break in the near future.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s